4.7 Article

Toxicity of Vertimec® 18 EC (active ingredient abamectin) to the neotropical cladoceran Ceriodaphnia silvestrii

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 558-564

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.006

关键词

Cladoceran; Pesticide; Bioassays; Model ecosystem; Tropics; Aquatic ecotoxicology

资金

  1. Brazilian government through the Special Visiting Researcher program (MEC/MCTI/CAPES/CNPq/FAPs) [402392/2013-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the toxicity of abamectin to the neotropical cladoceran Ceriodaphnia silvestrii. To this end, acute and chronic bioassays were conducted with the commercial formulation Vertimec (R) 18 EC. In addition, the toxicity of water samples taken from a microcosm experiment evaluating the effects of a single application (144 mu g a.i./L) and two applications (2 x 36 mu g a.i./L) of Vertimec (R) 18 EC, in the presence or absence of a tadpole species (Litho bates catesbeianus), was also assessed. The acute LC50-48 h for immobilization was 1.47 mu g a.i./L and chronic NOEC-8 d for survival and fertility (number of neonates per female) were 169 and 84 ng a.i./L, respectively. Irrespective of the presence of tadpoles, water samples from the microcosms applied with the single concentration of 144 mu g a.i./L remained toxic until the end of the experiment, even when samples were diluted 32 times with culture medium. Water in the repeated pesticide treatment showed a similar toxic response after both applications. Toxicity of water samples from the microcosms was lower than that expected based on the generated LC50 values, which is explained by a potential reduced bioavailability of the test compound resulting from absorbance to organic material. Potential side-effects on C. silvestrii related with the use of Vertimec (R) 18 EC in Brazil and the suitability of this species for tropical toxicity testing are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据