4.6 Article

The effect of imidazolium cations on the structure and activity of the Candida antarctica Lipase B enzyme in ionic liquids

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 18, 期 32, 页码 22062-22069

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp02355j

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF's Research Triangle MRSEC [DMR-1121107]
  2. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea
  3. Inha University Research Grant
  4. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [201405502] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to understand how cations affect the structural changes and enzyme activity of Lipase B from Candida antarctica, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of CALB in four types of ionic liquids (ILs) with varying sizes of imidazolium cations and correlated these results with the experimentally determined CALB activity. The imidazolium cations under study differ in the alkyl tail length in the following order: [Emim](+) < [Bmim](+) < [Hmim](+) < [Omim](+). We observed that the best enzyme activity and structural stability of CALB are obtained in [Bmim][TfO] and [Hmim][TfO]. In contrast, in [Emim][TfO], bonding of [TfO](-) to LYS-290 disrupts the interactions between LYS-290 and ILE-285, which leads to a closed catalytic gate conformation with low accessibility of substrates to the catalytic triad. In [Omim][TfO], strong hydrophobic interactions between [Omim](+) and LEU-278 result in a significant loss of the secondary structure of the alpha-10 helix and cause the exposure of the catalytic triad to ILs, which affects the stability of the catalytic triad and consequently deteriorates the enzyme activity. Overall, our study indicates that a high ion coordination number ([Emim][TfO]) or the presence of a long hydrophobic tail ([Omim][TfO]) can facilitate ion-protein interactions that cause structural distortions and a decrease in CALB enzyme activity in ILs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据