4.7 Article

Sorption characteristics and persistence of herbicide bispyribac sodium in different global soils

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 932-939

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.029

关键词

Bispyribac sodium; Adsorption; GUS; Dissipation and free energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dissipation kinetics and the adsorption characteristics of bispyribac sodium, a pyrimidinyloxybenzoic herbicide, in 21 types of soil collected from different locations in the U.S., Italy, Spain, Greece, France, U.K., the Netherlands, Germany, and India were evaluated under laboratory conditions. The soil sorption study was conducted using the batch equilibrium process. The paper also investigated the adsorption efficiency of bispyribac sodium in the presence of different kinds of background electrolytes, surfactants, and different temperatures in two different soils. The results showed that the Freundlich equation fits its adsorption well, and the Freundlich adsorption constant values (K-f) ranged from 0.3 to 5.6 mL g(-1). Adsorption isotherms were nonlinear, with 1/n(f) values <1. Bispyribac sodium adsorption by two soils increased with increasing electrolytes concentration using CaCl2, KCI, NH4Cl, KH2PO4 and MgCl2 as a background electrolytes. The adsorption coefficient value decreased when anionic and nonionic surfactants were used at the three surfactant concentrations in two types of soil but increased with cationic surfactant, and temperature. Sorption was positively correlated with OM and negatively correlated with a soil pH of 5.0 to 8.1. The free energy (Delta G) values of bispyribac sodium in the soils were less than 40 kJ mol(-1) and negative values were obtained. This indicates that the adsorption of bispyribac sodium is mainly a physical and spontaneous process. The GUS values were less than 2.9 in all the soil types studied, and the residues of bispyribac sodium were low to moderate to leacher (mobile) in the soil. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据