4.7 Article

Decolorization and mineralization of Allura Red AC azo dye by solar photoelectro-Fenton: Identification of intermediates

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.047

关键词

Allura Red AC; Electro-Fenton; Oxidation products; Solar photoelectro-Fenton; Water treatment

资金

  1. MINECO (Spain) [CTQ2013-48897-C2-1-R]
  2. FEDER funds
  3. MAEC-AECID (Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation of 2.5 L of Allura Red AC solutions in sulfate medium containing 0.50 mM Fe2+ has been studied by solar photoelectro-Fenton (SPEF) using a flow plant equipped with a Pt/air-diffusion cell and a solar photoreactor. Comparative electro-Fenton treatment yielded rapid total decolorization but poor mineralization, since most products were slowly destroyed by (OH)-O-center dot formed from Fenton's reaction between Fe2+ and H2O2 generated at the air-diffusion cathode. In contrast, the potent action of UV radiation from sunlight in SPEF allowed the rapid photolysis of recalcitrant intermediates, thus giving rise to a quick mineralization. Sulfate and nitrate ions, along with a large proportion of volatile N-derivatives, were always released. The increase in current density and decrease in azo dye concentration accelerated the decolorization and mineralization in SPEF, although lower current efficiency and greater specific energy consumption were obtained. The most cost-effective SPEF treatment was found for 460 mg L-1 azo dye in 0.05 M Na2SO4 at 50 mA cm(-2), which yielded 95% mineralization with 81% current efficiency and 8.50 kW h m(-3). No significant effect of sulfate concentration was found. Up to 16 aromatic intermediates and 11 short-chain carboxylic acids, including oxalic and oxamic as the most persistent ones, were detected by GC-MS and HPLC. The large oxidation ability of SPEF can be explained by the quick photolysis of Fe(III)-oxalate complexes and other undetected intermediates. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据