4.7 Article

Sorption behaviour of nonylphenol and nonylphenol monoethoxylate in soils

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 952-959

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.037

关键词

Nonylphenol; Nonylphenol monoethoxylate; Soil; Organic carbon; Sorption; Solid-liquid distribution coefficient

资金

  1. Spanish government (CICYT) [CTM 2008-01147/TECNO, CTM2008-03263/TECNO, CTM2011-27211]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR) [2009SGR1188]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2010FI_B 00513]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption behaviour of two alkylphenolic compounds (APCs), nonylphenol (NP) and nonylphenol monoethoxylate (NP1EO), was studied in five soils with contrasting characteristics. Sorption isotherms were obtained by equilibrating the soil samples with 0.01 mol L-1 CaCl2 solutions containing different initial concentrations of NP or NP1EO. Linear fitting was generally appropriate for describing the sorption behaviour of NP and NP1EO in the soils, with the exception of two cases, for which the Freundlich model was more suitable for describing the sorption pattern of NP1EO. Solid-liquid distribution coefficients derived from sorption isotherms (K-d) varied from 24 to 1059 mL g(-1) for NP and from 51 to 740 mL g(-1), for NP1EO. For most soils, sorption K-d values were higher for NP than for NP1EO due to the higher hydrophobicity of NP. Sorption reversibility of NP and NP1EO was also tested from desorption isotherms. Desorption solid-liquid distribution coefficients (K-d,K-des), obtained from linear fitting, were between 130 and 1467 mL g(-1) for NP and between 24 and 1285 mL g(-1) for NP1EO. K-d,K-des values were higher than K-d values, which demonstrated that target compounds were irreversibly sorbed into soils, with the exception of the high desorption yield (45%) of NP1EO in the soil with the lowest content of organic matter. The fraction of soil organic carbon (F-OC) was a key parameter that influenced the sorption of NP and NP1EO in soils, with logK(OC) values of 4.0 and 3.8, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据