4.6 Article

A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.028

关键词

Complex networks; Influential nodes; Weighted TOPSIS; Centrality measures; SIR model

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA041101]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61174022, 71271061, 61573290]
  3. China State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems [BUAA-VR-14KF-02]
  4. General Research Program of Natural Science of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education [14ZB0322]
  5. Self-financing Program of State Ethnic Affairs Commission of China [14SCZ014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying influential nodes in complex networks is still an open issue. Although various centrality measures have been proposed to address this problem, such as degree, betweenness, and closeness centralities, they all have some limitations. Recently, technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), as a tradeoff between the existing metrics, has been proposed to rank nodes effectively and efficiently. It regards the centrality measures as the multi-attribute of the complex network and connects the multi-attribute to synthesize the evaluation of node importance of each node. However, each attribute plays an equally important part in this method, which is not reasonable. In this paper, we improve the method to ranking the node's spreading ability. A new method, named as weighted technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (weighted TOPSIS) is proposed. In our method, we not only consider different centrality measures as the multi-attribute to the network, but also propose a new algorithm to calculate the weight of each attribute. To evaluate the performance of our method, we use the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model to do the simulation on four real networks. The experiments on four real networks show that the proposed method can rank the spreading ability of nodes more accurately than the original method. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据