4.6 Review

Infectious diseases of marine molluscs and host responses as revealed by genomic tools

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0206

关键词

marine diseases; parasites; genomics; immune response; mollusc; aquaculture

类别

资金

  1. US NSF EEID Program [1216220]
  2. New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium Project [6410-0010]
  3. USDA-NIFA/NJAES Animal Health Project [1004475/NJ32920]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1216220, 1215977] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More and more infectious diseases affect marine molluscs. Some diseases have impacted commercial species including MSX and Dermo of the eastern oyster, QPX of hard clams, withering syndrome of abalone and ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) infections of many molluscs. Although the exact transmission mechanisms are not well understood, human activities and associated environmental changes often correlate with increased disease prevalence. For instance, hatcheries and large-scale aquaculture create high host densities, which, along with increasing ocean temperature, might have contributed to OsHV-1 epizootics in scallops and oysters. A key to understanding linkages between the environment and disease is to understand how the environment affects the host immune system. Although we might be tempted to downplay the role of immunity in invertebrates, recent advances in genomics have provided insights into host and parasite genomes and revealed surprisingly sophisticated innate immune systems in molluscs. All major innate immune pathways are found in molluscs with many immune receptors, regulators and effectors expanded. The expanded gene families provide great diversity and complexity in innate immune response, which may be key to mollusc's defence against diverse pathogens in the absence of adaptive immunity. Further advances in host and parasite genomics should improve our understanding of genetic variation in parasite virulence and host disease resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据