4.7 Article

Application of central composite design for the optimization of on-line solid phase extraction of Cu2 + by calix[4]arene bonded silica resin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.05.020

关键词

Copper; Calix[4]arene; Chemometrics solid phase extraction; Break through curve; Atomic absorption spectroscopy

资金

  1. National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Selcuk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Konya, Turkey [2216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Present study deals with the optimization of on-line solid phase extraction of Cu2+ using calix[4]arene based silica resin by the assessment of central composite design of response surface methodology. The immobilized resin was characterized with FT-IR and SEM techniques. The data obtained from experimental program of central composite design was used to model the parameters that significantly affect on Cu2+ extraction. The variables chosen were metal ion concentration, pH, and temperature. Second-order quadratic model was used to approximate the effect of variables on extraction efficiency. Furthermore, suggested model was also validated with the analysis of variance. The predicted values were in good agreement with experimental results, suggesting proficient application of central composite design as an economical alternative to acquire maximum amount of information for the modeling of on-line solid phase extraction with little number of experiments. Additionally, data obtained for different concentrations was analyzed by Freundlich, Langmuir, D-R isotherms, and Scatchard plot analysis. The results suggested that Langmuir isotherm was best fit model with R-2 0.99, the energy calculated from D-R isotherm was 15.14 KJ/mol suggesting that chemical force is involved in sorption process. The method was also validated for its linearity, accuracy, and precision. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据