4.7 Article

NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics for the discrimination of pure, powdered, purple sweet potatoes and their samples adulterated with the white sweet potato flour

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.03.004

关键词

NIR spectroscopy; Purple sweet potato; Adulteration; Anthocyanin and antioxidant activity; Chemometrics methods; Pattern recognitions

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21065007]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology of Nanchang University [SKLF-ZZA201302, SKLF-ZZB201303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work demonstrates how near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIR) in combination with chemometrics can be used to analyse and discriminate powdered, pure and adulterated sweet potato samples. Thus, the principal component analysis (PCA) method, which is able to produce diagrams of objects as a function of PC scores, was able to distinguish and group the NIRS from the many different types of potato sample. Other methods such as the radial basis function-partial least squares (RBF-PLS) as well the successive projection algorithm (SPA) combination, distinguished the purple and white sweet potato varieties from each other as well as, importantly, from the different adulterated purple sweet potato samples. Furthermore, the total anthocyanin (TA) and total antioxidant activity (TAA) parameters were also analysed quantitatively in these samples, and high residual prediction deviation (RPD) values were noted. Also, the two recognition methods, k-nearest neighbours (KNN) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), were able to discriminate the sweet potato samples. Thus, overall this work demonstrated that NIRS combined with chemometrics methods can be employed for the identification of purple sweet potato, white sweet potato and their adulterated samples; in addition, quantitative analysis for TA and TM in such samples can be successfully performed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据