4.5 Review

Nanoparticle-Based Medicines: A Review of FDA-Approved Materials and Clinical Trials to Date

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 2373-2387

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1958-5

关键词

clinical trials; FDA; nanomedicine; nanoparticles; nanopharmaceuticals; nanotherpeutics

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1099231]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT110100284, DP140100951, DE130100800]
  3. National Breast Cancer Foundation [NC-14-037]
  4. Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology [CE140100036]
  5. Australian Research Council [DE130100800] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  6. National Breast Cancer Foundation [NC-14-037] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this review we provide an up to date snapshot of nanomedicines either currently approved by the US FDA, or in the FDA clinical trials process. We define nanomedicines as therapeutic or imaging agents which comprise a nanoparticle in order to control the biodistribution, enhance the efficacy, or otherwise reduce toxicity of a drug or biologic. We identified 51 FDA-approved nanomedicines that met this definition and 77 products in clinical trials, with similar to 40% of trials listed in clinicaltrials.gov started in 2014 or 2015. While FDA approved materials are heavily weighted to polymeric, liposomal, and nanocrystal formulations, there is a trend towards the development of more complex materials comprising micelles, protein-based NPs, and also the emergence of a variety of inorganic and metallic particles in clinical trials. We then provide an overview of the different material categories represented in our search, highlighting nanomedicines that have either been recently approved, or are already in clinical trials. We conclude with some comments on future perspectives for nanomedicines, which we expect to include more actively-targeted materials, multi-functional materials (theranostics) and more complicated materials that blur the boundaries of traditional material categories. A key challenge for researchers, industry, and regulators is how to classify new materials and what additional testing (e.g. safety and toxicity) is required before products become available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据