4.5 Article

Bromelain-Functionalized Multiple-Wall Lipid-Core Nanocapsules: Formulation, Chemical Structure and Antiproliferative Effect Against Human Breast Cancer Cells (MCF-7)

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 438-452

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-2074-2

关键词

bromelain; lipid-core nanocapsules; MCF-7 human breast cancer cells; metal-chitosan complex; surface-functionalized nanoparticles

资金

  1. Brazilian Agency CAPES
  2. Brazilian Agencies: CNPq/Brasilia/Brazil
  3. Brazilian Agencies CAPES/MEC
  4. Brazilian Agencies FAPERGS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose This study was conducted a promising approach to surface functionalization developed for lipid-core nanocapsules and the merit to pursue new strategies to treat solid tumors. Methods Bromelain-functionalized multiple-wall lipid-core nanocapsules (Bro-MLNC-Zn) were produced by self-assembling following three steps of interfacial reactions. Physicochemical and structural characteristics, in vitro proteolytic activity (casein substrate) and antiproliferative activity (breast cancer cells, MCF-7) were determined. Results Bro-MLNC-Zn had z-average diameter of 135 nm and zeta potential of +23 mV. The complex is formed by a Zn-N chemical bond and a chelate with hydroxyl and carboxyl groups. Bromelain complexed at the nanocapsule surface maintained its proteolytic activity and showed antiproliferative effect against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) (72.6 +/- 1.2% at 1.250 mu g mL(-1) and 65.5 +/- 5.5% at 0.625 mu g mL(-1)). Comparing Bro-MLNC-Zn and bromelain solution, the former needed a dose 160-folds lower than the latter for a similar effect. Tripan blue dye assay corroborated the results. Conclusions The surface functionalization approach produced an innovative formulation having a much higher antiproliferative effect than the bromelain solution, even though both in vitro proteolytic activity were similar, opening up a great opportunity for further studies in nanomedicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据