4.6 Article

Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of carotenes produced by Dunaliella salina under stress

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 10, 页码 2269-2275

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2016.1153660

关键词

DPPH assay; MCF-7; MTT; salinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Dunaliella salina Teodoresco (Dunaliellaceae) is one of the promising microalgae consumed as food and medicine for many years. Objective Dunaliella salina was grown under different stress conditions for enhancing carotene production. The carotene enriched extract was evaluated for antioxidant and cytotoxic activity. Materials and methods Carotene content was calculated under salinity, nitrogen and temperature stress conditions. Antioxidant activity was determined through DPPH assay by incubating the samples for 45 min with 250 lg/mL of extract and reducing power assay was performed with 50, 100, 150 and 200 mu g/mL of extract. Cytotoxicity was determined by incubating similar to 2 x 10(4) MCF-7 (breast cancer) cells with 250 mu g of extract in each well for 72 h by MTT assay. Result Carotene content was significantly increased to 9.8 (3.5 M NaCl), 13.9 (37 degrees C), 8.2 (250 mM KNO3) and 10.6 mu g/mL (nitrogen-depleted medium) as compared with 3.2 mu g/mL in normal conditions (1.7 M NaCl, 0.75 mM KNO3 and 28 degrees C). Free radical scavenging activity increased at 3.0 and 3.5 M NaCl (27.8 and 57.5%, respectively), 37 degrees C (31.4%) and in nitrogen-depleted medium (41.9%) compared with normal (15%) conditions. Carotene content and scavenging activity were positively correlated under salinity (r = 0.97), temperature (r = 0.85) and nitrogen (r = 0.7) stress conditions. Cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cell lines increased due to increase in carotene content suggesting that cytotoxicity may be associated with carotene accumulation. Discussion and conclusions Carotene content enhanced by D. salina under stress conditions increased the antioxidant and cytotoxic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据