4.7 Article

Characteristics of Children and Adolescents With Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 138, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-0120

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Network of Pediatric MS Centers [HC 0165]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) in the United States. METHODS: This prospective observational study included children and adolescents with MS. Cases were evaluated across 9 geographically diverse sites as part of the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers. RESULTS: A total of 490 children and adolescents (324 girls, 166 boys) were enrolled; 28% developed symptoms before 12 years of age. The proportion of girls increased with age from 58% (< 12 years) to 70% (>= 12 years). Race and ethnicity as self-identified were: white, 67%; African American, 21%; and non-Hispanic, 70%. Most (94%) of the cases were born in the United States, and 39% had 1 or both foreign-born parents. Fifty-five percent of cases had a monofocal presentation; 31% had a prodrome (most frequently infectious), most often among those aged < 12 years (P <.001). Children aged < 12 years presented more commonly with encephalopathy and coordination problems (P <.001). Sensory symptoms were more frequently reported by older children (ie, those aged >= 12 years) (P <.001); 78% of girls had MS onset postmenarche. The initial Expanded Disability Status Scale score for the group was < 3.0, and the annualized relapse rate was 0.647 for the first 2 years. Interval from symptom onset to diagnosis and from diagnosis to initiation of disease-modifying therapy was longer among those < 12 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric MS in the United States is characterized by racial and ethnic diversity, a high proportion of children with foreign-born parents, and differences in clinical features and timing of treatment among those < 12 years of age compared with older children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据