4.6 Article

Subclinical mastitis occurs frequently in association with dramatic changes in inflammatory/anti-inflammatory breast milk components

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 81, 期 4, 页码 556-564

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.220

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA (ANRS), Paris, France [VTS 063009/Z/00/Z, ANRS 2008-033]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Infectiopole Sud
  4. Marseille, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Subclinical mastitis (SCM) is a frequent, but poorly ch.aracterized entity that may influence immune development of breastfed infants. Mechanisms driving the emergence of SCM and changes in immunological content of human milk during SCM remain to be explored. In this study, the breast milk environment was to describe'during SCM. METHODS: One hundred and ten samples of mature breast milk were collected from 44 healthy, HIV-negative mothers, included in a large infant feeding intervention cohort (ANRS 1271Nertical Transmission Study). Immune markers related to inflammatory/anti-inflammatory balances and secreted in response to bacterial exposure were explored in SCM breast milk samples (Na/K ratio > 1) and compared to non-SCM controls. RESULTS: SCM was observed in 23% of women (95% confidence interval (CD: 21-24) and associated with higher levels of inflammatory markers ((beta 2 microgobulin, PS100A9, TNF-alpha(,) IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, and RANTES) and Th1-related cytokines (IL-2R, IL-12p40/70, IFN-alpha, IFN-gamma ,CXCL-9, and IP-10). High levels of factors secreted in response to bacteria and li,popolysaccharide (LPS) exposure were observed in SCM breast milk samples (MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, LPS binding protein, alpha-defensins, and antileukoproteinase 1). CONCLUSION: SCM is associated with important changes in breast milk microenvironment, with a proinflammatory/Th1cytokine predominant profile. During SCM, cytokine imbalances in breast milk may have a notable influence on mucosal immune system of the infant early in life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据