4.6 Article

Initial hyperinsulinemia and subsequent β-cell dysfunction is associated with elevated palmitate levels

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 267-274

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.80

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission FP7 project Beta-Judo [279153]
  2. Swedish Diabetes Association [DIA 2013-043]
  3. Swedish Medical Research Council [72X-14019]
  4. Uppsala Regional Research Council
  5. Uppsala University Innovation
  6. Gillbergska Foundation
  7. Family Ernfors Foundation [150430]
  8. SRC [621-2011-4423, 2015-4870]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity-related diabetes in childhood is increasing and circulating levels of nonesterified fatty acids may constitute a link. Here, the association between palmitate and insulin secretion was investigated in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: Obese and lean children and adolescents (n = 80) were included. Palmitate was measured at fasting; insulin and glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Human islets were cultured for 0 to 7 d in presence of 0.5 mmol/l palmitate. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), insulin content and apoptosis were measured. RESULTS: Obese subjects had fasting palmitate levels between 0.10 and 0.33 mmol/l, with higher average levels compared to lean subjects. While obese children with elevated palmitate (>0.20 mmol/l) had accentuated insulin levels during OGTT, obese adolescents with high palmitate had delayed first-phase insulin response. In human islets exposed to palmitate for 2 d GSIS was twofold enhanced, but after 7 d attenuated. Intracellular insulin content decreased time-dependently in islets cultured in the presence of palmitate and cleaved caspase 3 increased. CONCLUSION: The rapid accentuated and delayed insulin secretory responses observed in obese children and adolescents, respectively, with high palmitate levels may reflect changes in islet secretory activity and integrity induced by extended exposure to the fatty acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据