4.5 Article

Clinical Characteristics of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in Ill and Colonized Children in Colombia

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 237-241

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000987

关键词

Klebsiella pneumoniae; Colombia; beta-lactamases; Medellin; carbapenem resistance; children

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections represent a growing problem and a serious global threat. Data in children are scarce. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) are the most common mechanism of resistance this organism has developed. We report the clinical characteristics and outcomes from a cohort of children infected or colonized with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKp) at a tertiary care center in Medellin, Colombia. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all pediatric cases from whom CRKp isolates were obtained from 2008 to 2013. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Results: A total of 34 infected children (median age, 22.8 months) with 43 episodes and 55 colonized patients (median age, 33 months) were identified. All patients had at least 1 risk factor previously related with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections (premorbid conditions, previous exposure to antibiotics, prolonged length of stay and use of indwelling devices). Urinary tract infections, abdominal infections and bacteremia were the most common clinical presentations. Overall mortality was 38%, and it was lower when a meropenem-containing regimen was used. Colistin was the most used antibiotic either alone or in combination and was associated with 8.8% of nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: CRKp infections have high mortality in children and usually occur in children with comorbidities, prolonged hospital stay and prior antibiotic exposure. Combined therapy with meropenem-containing regimens seems to be the best option in severely ill children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据