4.1 Article

Short-Term Resistance Training Attenuates Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction in Obese Adolescents

期刊

PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 374-380

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/pes.2015-0191

关键词

adolescent; exercise; resistance training; sport physiology; clinical evaluation

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support in the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction (CADysf) in children is often associated to obesity and may be attenuated by physical activity. In this study, we investigated the effects of resistance training (RT) upon CADysf assessed by heart rate variability (HRV) in obese adolescents. Method: Volunteers were assigned into groups according to standard deviation scores for body mass index (z-BMI) and percentile for age and sex: obese (OB; z-BMI from 2 to 3 and >= 95th percentile, n = 24) and normal weight controls (CG; z-BMI from -2-1 and < 85th percentile, n = 20). OB performed isolated RT during 12 weeks [3 sets of 6-10reps with 70-85% 10RM]. Waist circumference, systolic/diastolic blood pressures (SBP/DBP), lipids, and HRV were assessed at baseline. Only OB underwent postintervention assessments. Results: At baseline, SBP (122.4 +/- 9.1 vs. 109.7 +/- 11.5 mmHg, p <.001) and DBP (76.1 +/- 7.1 vs. 65.3 +/- 5.9 mmHg, p <.001) were higher, while parasympathetic HRV indexes were lower (p <.05) in OB compared with CG. After RT, waist circumference (3%, p <.001) and SBP (10%, p <.001) reduced in OB. Parasympathetic indexes of HRV increased in OB (SDNN: 25%, p =.03; rMSSD: 48%, p =.0006; pNN50: 67%, p =.001; total power: 54%, p =.01; HF: 101%, p =.001) and baseline differences between groups for sympathetic and parasympathetic activities were no longer observed after RT. Conclusion: RT attenuated CAdyfs and BP in obese adolescents, by increasing parasympathetic activity and decreasing sympatho-vagal balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据