4.6 Article

Walking Down the Chalcogenic Group of the Periodic Table: From Singlet to Triplet Organic Emitters

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 43, 页码 15377-15387

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501260

关键词

chalcogens; heterocycles; luminescence; photophysics; supramolecular chemistry

资金

  1. Belgian National Research Foundation (FRFC) [2.4.550.09]
  2. Loterie Nationale
  3. TINTIN ARC project from the Belgian French community [09/14-023]
  4. Science Policy Office of the Belgian Federal Government [BELSPO-IAP 7/05]
  5. ERC
  6. CNR [PM.P04.010]
  7. MIUR [RBFR10DAK6, 2010CX2TLM]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, X-ray crystal structures, ground- and excited-state UV/Vis absorption spectra, and luminescence properties of chalcogen-doped organic emitters equipped on both extremities with benzoxa-, benzothia-, benzoselena- and benzotellurazole (1(X) and 2(X)) moieties have been reported for the first time. The insertion of the four different chalcogen atoms within the same molecular skeleton enables the investigation of only the chalcogenic effect on the organisation and photophysical properties of the material. Detailed crystal-structure analyses provide evidence of similar packing for 2(O)-2(Se), in which the benzoazoles are engaged in - stacking and, for the heavier atoms, in secondary XX and XN bonding interactions. Detailed computational analysis shows that the arrangement is essentially governed by the interplay of van der Waals and secondary bonding interactions. Progressive quenching of the fluorescence and concomitant onset of phosphorescence features with gradually shorter lifetimes are detected as the atomic weight of the chalcogen heteroatom increases, with the tellurium-doped derivatives exhibiting only emission from the lowest triplet excited state. Notably, the phosphorescence spectra of the selenium and tellurium derivatives can be recorded even at room temperature; this is a very rare finding for fully organic emitters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据