4.4 Article

Transition and transfer of childhood cancer survivors to adult care: A national survey of pediatric oncologists

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 346-352

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26156

关键词

adolescents/young adults; childhood cancer survivors; transitioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pediatric oncologists are responsible for ensuring that adolescent and young adult (AYA) childhood cancer survivors have the knowledge and skills necessary to manage their followup care in adult healthcare systems. Procedures: To describe transition practices and barriers to transfer, we electronically surveyed U.S. Children's Oncology Group members: 507/1449 responded (35%) and 347/507 (68%) met eligibility criteria. Results: Of 347 respondents, 50% are male, median years in practice 10 (range 5-22), 37% practice in freestanding children's hospitals. Almost all care for survivors up to age 21 years (96%), 42% care for survivors over age 25 years, and only 16% over age 30 years. While 66% of oncologists reported providing transition education to their patients, very few (8%) reported using standardized transition assessments. The most frequent barriers to transfer were perceived attachment to provider (91%), lack of adult providerswith cancer survivor expertise (86%), patient's cognitive delay (81%), or unstable social situation (80%). Oncologistswhocontinue to care for patients older than 25 years are more likely to perceive parents' attachment to provider (P=0.037) and patients' social situation as barriers to transfer (P = 0.044). Four themes emerged from a content analysis of 75 respondents to the open-ended question inviting comments on transition/transfer practices: desire for flexible transfer criteria; providers as barriers; provider lack of transition knowledge, skills, and resources; and desire for collaboration. Conclusions: Although most pediatric oncologists reported transferring AYA cancer survivors to adult care and providing some transition education, they endorse deficits in transition skills, emotional readiness, and institutional resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据