4.4 Article

The Role of Leukapheresis in the Current Management of Hyperleukocytosis in Newly Diagnosed Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 63, 期 9, 页码 1546-1551

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26056

关键词

acute; ALL; general; leukemias; molecular diagnosis and therapy; oncology

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA021765]
  2. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHyperleukocytosis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with early morbidity and mortality. The use of leukapheresis in these children treated with contemporary therapy remains controversial. ProcedureWe analyzed clinical data from patients enrolled onto frontline protocols for ALL (Total Therapy XV and XVI) between 2003 and 2014. We documented adverse events within the first 14 days in patients with a white blood cell (WBC) count 200 x 10(9)/l and reviewed their management. ResultsFifty-three (7.8%) of 678 consecutive pediatric patients with newly diagnosed ALL presented with hyperleukocytosis (median WBC count 393 x 10(9)/l; range 200-1,014). Two deaths in patients without initial hyperleukocytosis occurred within the first 2 weeks from diagnosis secondary to bacterial sepsis. A total of 21 (40%) patients with ALL and hyperleukocytosis developed grade 3 or 4 adverse events regardless of the use of leukapheresis (P > 0.99 and P = 0.19). Sixteen of 53 (30%) patients with ALL received low-dose chemotherapy for leukocytoreduction initially. One-third of patients received urate oxidase, and none of the patients with hyperleukocytosis required hemodialysis. ConclusionsThe early morbidity and mortality commonly associated with hyperleukocytosis in children with newly diagnosed ALL can be avoided with contemporary supportive care and conservative management possibly obviating the need for costly and potentially dangerous leukapheresis. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据