4.7 Article

Global discriminative-based nonnegative spectral clustering

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 172-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.01.035

关键词

Spectral clustering; Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF); Global discrimination information

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2013CB329402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61371201]
  3. Program for Cheung Kong Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on spectral graph theory, spectral clustering is an optimal graph partition problem. It has been proven that the spectral clustering is equivalent to nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) under certain conditions. Based on the equivalence, some spectral clustering methods are proposed, but the global discriminative information of the dataset is neglected. In this paper, based on the equivalence between spectral clustering and NMF, we simultaneously maximize the between-class scatter matrix and minimize the within-class scatter matrix to enhance the discriminating power. We integrate the geometrical structure and discriminative structure in a joint framework. With a global discriminative regularization term added into the nonnegative matrix factorization framework, we propose two novel spectral clustering methods, named global discriminative-based nonnegative and spectral clustering (GDBNSC-Ncut and GDBNSC-Rcut) These new spectral clustering algorithms can preserve both the global geometrical structure and global discriminative structure. The intrinsic geometrical information of the dataset is detected, and clustering quality is improved with enhanced discriminating power. In addition, the proposed algorithms also have very good abilities of handling out-of-sample data. Experimental results on real word data demonstrate that the proposed algorithms outperform some state-of-the-art methods with good clustering qualities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据