4.5 Article

Anything above marijuana takes priority: Obstetric providers' attitudes and counseling strategies regarding perinatal marijuana use

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 99, 期 9, 页码 1446-1451

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.003

关键词

Patient-provider communication; Substance use; Pregnancy; Marijuana

资金

  1. National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) [1R01DA026410-01A1]
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Health
  3. Magee Womens Hospital Volunteer Service Board
  4. National Institutes of Health [UL1TR000005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe obstetric provider attitudes, beliefs, approaches, concerns, and needs about addressing perinatal marijuana use with their pregnant patients. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with obstetric providers and asked them to describe their thoughts and experiences about addressing perinatal marijuana use. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and reviewed to identify themes. Results: Fifty-one providers participated in semi-structured interviews. Providers admitted they were not familiar with identified risks of marijuana use during pregnancy, they perceived marijuana was not as dangerous as other illicit drugs, and they believed patients did not view marijuana as a drug. Most provider counseling strategies focused on marijuana's status as an illegal drug and the risk of child protective services being contacted if patients tested positive at time of delivery. Conclusions: When counseling about perinatal marijuana use, obstetric providers focus more on legal issues than on health risks. They describe needing more information regarding medical consequences of marijuana use during pregnancy. Practice implications: Provider training should include information about potential consequences of perinatal marijuana use and address ways to improve obstetric providers' counseling. Future studies should assess changes in providers' attitudes as more states consider the legalization of marijuana. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据