4.2 Review

Recent advances in renal cell carcinoma from a pathological point of view

期刊

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 481-490

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pin.12433

关键词

cancer stem cell; epithelial and mesenchymal transition; molecular-targeted therapy; renal cell carcinoma; resistance

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [25460422]
  2. MEXT [24390374, 24249022]
  3. Foundation of Promotion of Cancer Research
  4. MEXT
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25462915, 25460422] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this article is to review the recent advances in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from a pathological point of view. Because the genetic features and morphological characteristics have become major criteria for the classification of RCC, special techniques, such as immunohistochemistry, are essential to the differential diagnosis of renal tumors. Metastasis is frequently observed among the RCC patients with curative nephrectomy, and extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and heparanase, play a key role in invasion and metastasis of RCC. Snail and Slug, transcription factors of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), accelerate cancer cell invasion through downregulation of E-cadherin and up-regulation of MMP. Therapies targeted at the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway have become the standard treatment of metastatic RCC. Although they lead to tumor shrinkage mainly by inhibiting angiogenesis, they have typically been associated with drug resistance. The mechanism of the resistance remains largely unknown, but complex events including re-activation of angiogenesis, EMT and cancer stem cells, and immune escape are implicated in the refractory response to the therapy. Recent advances of the research on RCC have caused the changes of classification and therapy, and pathologists should take overall view of these as integrated pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据