4.5 Article

Experimental and numerical study of pseudo-2D circulating fluidized beds

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 48-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2015.09.009

关键词

Circulating fluidized bed; Euler-Euler approach; Gas-solid flow; Kinetic theory of granular flow; Particle size distribution; 2D vs 3D

资金

  1. BK-M [BK-369/RIE-6/2011]
  2. National Center for Research and Development, development of coal gasification technology for high production of fuels and energy [CzTB. 5.2]
  3. National Centre for Research and Development, within the confines of the Research and Development Strategic Program, Advanced Technologies for Energy Generation [SP/E/2/66420/10, 2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present experimental investigations and numerical simulations of a pseudo-2D riser. Experiments were performed for various airflow rates, particle types/diameters, and particle size distributions. Pressure distributions along the wall of the riser were measured. Additional measurements from a smaller pseudo-2D riser (Kallio et al., 2009; Shah et al., 2012) were used to analyze horizontal solids volume fraction profiles. The experimental data were compared with simulation results carried out using an Euler-Euler approach. A mesh sensitivity study was conducted for numerical simulations and effects associated with simplifying real 3D geometry to a 2D model were examined. In addition, the effect of using an algebraic equation to represent the granular temperature versus a full partial differential, equation also was examined for numerical simulations. Results showed small but significant near-wall sensitivity of the flow variables to mesh size. Substantial differences in mean pressure, solids distribution, and solid velocities were obtained, when 2D and 3D simulation results were compared. Finally, applying the simplified granular temperature equation for turbulent fluidization and for dilute-phase transport can lead to incorrect predictions in models. (C) 2015 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据