4.3 Review

Leishmania infection: painful or painless?

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 116, 期 2, 页码 465-475

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-5340-7

关键词

Leishmania; Leishmaniasis; Tropical parasitic disease; Pain

资金

  1. Coordenadoria de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
  2. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao (MCTI)
  3. Secretaria da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (SETI)
  4. Departamento de Ciencia e Tecnologia - Ministerio da Saude (DECIT/MS)
  5. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  6. Fundacao Araucaria
  7. Secretaria de Saude do Estado do Parana (SESA)
  8. Governo do Estado do Parana (Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complex life cycle and immunopathological features underpinning the interaction of Leishmania parasites and their mammalian hosts poses frequent poorly explored and inconclusively resolved questions. The altered nociceptive signals over the course of leishmaniasis remain an intriguing issue for nociceptive and parasitology researchers. Experimental investigations have utilized behavioral, morphological, and neuro-immune approaches in the study of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). The data generated indicates new venues for the study of the pathological characteristics of nociceptive processing in this parasitic disease. Leishmania-induced pain may be easily observed in mice and rats. However, nociceptive data is more complex in human investigations, including the occurrence of painless lesions in mucocutaneous and cutaneous leishmaniasis. Data from recent decades indicate that humans can also be affected by pain-related symptoms, often distinct from the region of body infection. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying such variable nociceptive states in humans during the course of leishmaniasis are an active area of research. The present article reviews nociception in leishmaniasis, including in experimental models of CL and clinical reports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据