4.2 Article

Morpholino antisense oligo inhibits trans-splicing of pre-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor mRNA of Trypanosoma cruzi and suppresses parasite growth and infectivity

期刊

PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 175-179

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.12.001

关键词

Trypanosoma cruzi; Morpholino antisense oligo; Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; Trans-splicing

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [15 K08452, 24390102]
  2. Pharmacological Research Foundation, Tokyo
  3. Foundation of Strategic Research Projects in Private Universities from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan [S1201013]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K15268, 24390102, 25670205] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morpholino antisense oligos (MAOs) are used to investigate physiological gene function by inhibiting gene translation or construction of specific alternative splicing variants by blocking cis-splicing. MAOs are attractive drug candidates for viral- and bacterial-infectious disease therapy because of properties such as in vivo stability and specificity to target genes. Recently, we showed that phosphorothioate antisense oligos against Trypanosoma cruzi inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (TcIP3R) mRNA inhibit the parasite host cell infection. In the present study, we identified the spliced leader (SL) acceptor of pre-TcIP3R mRNA and synthesized MAO, which inhibited trans-splicing of the transcript (MAO-1). MAO-1 was found to inhibit the addition of SL-RNA to pre-TcIP3R mRNA by real-time RT-PCR analysis. Treatment of the parasites with MAO-1 significantly impaired the growth and infectivity into host cells. These results indicate that MAO-1 is a potential novel drug for Chagas disease and that MAOs inhibiting trans-splicing can be used to investigate the physiology of trypanosomal genes leading to the development of novel drugs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据