4.4 Article

Richness and distribution of tropical oyster parasites in two oceans

期刊

PARASITOLOGY
卷 143, 期 9, 页码 1119-1132

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182015001900

关键词

Panama Canal; corridor; isthmus; biogeography; protist; species diversity

资金

  1. Consortium for Understanding and Sustaining a Biodiverse Planet and Hunterdon funds
  2. Smithsonian Institution MarineGEO Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. NSF/BSI [DEB-0315995]
  4. NSF AToL [EF-0531603]
  5. NSF/RAPID [DEB 1045690]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parasites can exert strong effects on population to ecosystem level processes, but data on parasites are limited for many global regions, especially tropical marine systems. Characterizing parasite diversity and distributions are the first steps towards understanding the potential impacts of parasites. The Panama Canal serves as an interesting location to examine tropical parasite diversity and distribution, as it is a conduit between two oceans and a hub for international trade. We examined metazoan and protistan parasites associated with ten oyster species collected from both Panamanian coasts, including the Panama Canal and Bocas del Toro. We found multiple metazoan taxa (pea crabs, Stylochus spp., Urastoma cyrinae). Our molecular screening for protistan parasites detected four species of Perkinsus (Perkinsus marinus, Perkinsus chesapeaki, Perkinsus olseni, Perkinsus beihaiensis) and several haplosporidians, including two genera (Minchinia, Haplosporidium). Species richness was higher for the protistan parasites than for the metazoans, with haplosporidian richness being higher than Perkinsus richness. Perkinsus species were the most frequently detected and most geographically widespread among parasite groups. Parasite richness and overlap differed between regions, locations and oyster hosts. These results have important implications for tropical parasite richness and the dispersal of parasites due to shipping associated with the Panama Canal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据