4.4 Article

BUOYANCY MECHANISMS LIMIT PRESERVATION OF COLEOID CEPHALOPOD SOFT TISSUES IN MESOZOIC LAGERSTATTEN

期刊

PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 1-14

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pala.12267

关键词

coleoid; cephalopod; buoyancy; calcium phosphate; taphonomy; bias

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council studentship [P14DF19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coleoid cephalopods are characterized by internalization of their shell, and are divided into the ten-armed Decabrachia (squids and cuttlefish) and the eight-armed Vampyropoda (octopuses and vampire squid). They have a rich fossil record predominantly of the limited biomineralized skeletal elements they possess: arm hooks, statoliths, mouthparts (the buccal mass) and internal shell (gladius or pen), although exquisitely preserved soft tissue coleoids are known from several Lagerstatten worldwide. Recent studies have shown that although morphological similarities between extant decabra-chian gladii and fossil examples exist, no known examples of fossil decabrachians are currently known. However, molecular clock data and phylogenetic bracketing suggest that they should be present in Lagerstatten that are rich in vampyropod soft tissue fossils (i.e. Hakel and Hadjoula Lagerstatten, Cretaceous, Lebanon). We propose that a hitherto unknown taphonomic bias pertaining to the differing methods of buoyancy control within coleoid groups limits preservation potential. Both negatively and neutrally buoyant decabrachians use chemical buoyancy control (ammonia) whereas vampyropods do not. In the event of rapid burial in an environment conducive to exceptional preservation, ammonia dramatically decreases the ability of the decabrachian carcass to generate the required pH for authigenic calcium phosphate replacement, limiting its preservation potential. Moreover, the greater surface area and comparatively fragile dermis further decrease the potential for fossilization. This taphonomic bias may have contributed to the lack of preserved labile soft-tissues in other cephalopods groups such as the ammonoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据