4.2 Article

Secondary Endolymphatic Hydrops After Acoustic Trauma

期刊

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 428-433

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001036

关键词

Acoustic trauma; Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential; Firearms; Meniere's disease; Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential; Secondary endolymphatic hydrops

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan [NSC 102-2314-B002-102-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study applied an inner ear test battery in patients with secondary hydrops after acoustic trauma to assess the inner ear deficits. Study Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University hospital. Methods: Twenty patients with secondary hydrops after acoustic trauma were assigned to Group A. The interval between noise exposure and the testing time varied from 1 month to 3 years (median 3 months). Another 20 patients without progressive hearing loss for at least 3 years after acoustic trauma were assigned to Group B. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, laterality, and noise source. Before treatment, all patients received audiometry, and caloric, ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP), and cervical VEMP (cVEMP) tests. Results: Percentages of abnormal mean hearing level (MHL), cVEMP test, oVEMP test, and caloric test were 75%, 75%, 61%, and 43% in Group A, and 35%, 57%, 61%, and 39% in Group B, respectively. Both groups exhibited a significantly declining sequence in inner ear function. Comparison of the abnormalities in the inner ear test battery between Groups A and B revealed a significant difference in percentages of abnormal MHL, but not in those of abnormal cVEMP, oVEMP, and caloric tests. Conclusion: Secondary hydrops after acoustic trauma occurs mainly on the cochlear part, but less on the vestibular part probably because previous acoustic trauma, i.e., firearms have severely damaged the vestibular partition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据