4.5 Review

Thalassemia-associated osteoporosis: a systematic review on treatment and brief overview of the disease

期刊

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 3409-3425

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3719-z

关键词

Bisphosphonates; Denosumab; Fractures; Healing; Pain; Strontium ranelate; Teriparatide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The life expectancy of patients with thalassemia has increased markedly in recent years resulting in the aging of the population and the emergence of new comorbidities. The majority of patients with thalassemia have low bone mineral density and experience lifelong fracture rates as high as 71 %. The pathogenesis of thalassemia-associated osteoporosis (TAO) is multifactorial with anemia and iron overload playing crucial role in its development. Data concerning the prevention and treatment of TAO are extremely limited. We performed a literature research in Pubmed and Scopus to identify interventional studies evaluating the effects of various agents on TAO. Seventeen studies were retrieved. We present the results of these studies as well as a brief overview of TAO including presentation, pathogenesis, and management. Most of the studies identified are of poor quality, are not randomized controlled, and include small number of participants. There are no data concerning effects on fracture rates. Bisphosphonates are the most widely studied agents and among them zoledronic acid is the most well studied. Hormone replacement treatment (HRT) shows beneficial but small effects. Denosumab and strontium ranelate have each been evaluated in only a single study, while there are no data about the effects of anabolic agents. Given the increased life expectancy and the increase in fracture rates with age, more data about the management of TAO are warranted. Moreover, due to the need for lifelong management starting at young age, careful treatment plans which may include sequential treatment may often be required. However, currently, there are no relevant data available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据