4.5 Article

Biochemical response to substrate reduction therapy versus enzyme replacement therapy in Gaucher disease type 1 patients

期刊

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0413-3

关键词

Gaucher disease; Eliglustat; Miglustat; Chitotriosidase; Glucosylsphingosine; Glucosylceramide; Enzyme replacement therapy

资金

  1. Genzyme
  2. Shire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We retrospectively compared biochemical responses in type 1 Gaucher disease patients to treatment with glycosphingolipid synthesis inhibitors miglustat and eliglustat and ERT. Methods: Seventeen GD1 patients were included (n = 6 eliglustat, (two switched from ERT), n = 9 miglustat (seven switchers), n = 4 ERT (median dose 60U/kg/m). Plasma protein markers reflecting disease burden (chitotriosidase, CCL18) and lipids reflecting substrate accumulation (glucosylsphingosine, glucosylceramide) were determined. Also, liver and spleen volumes, hemoglobin, platelets, and fat fraction were measured. Results: In patients naive to treatment, chitotriosidase, CCL18 and glucosylsphingosine decreased comparably upon eliglustat and ERT treatment, while the response to miglustat was less. After 2 years, median decrease of chitotriosidase was 89 % (range 77-98), 88 % (78-92) and 37 % (29-46) for eliglustat, ERT and miglustat naive patients respectively; decrease of CCL18 was 73 % (63-78), 54 % (43-86), and 10 % (3-18); decrease of glucosylsphingosine was 86 % (78-93), 78 % (65-91), 48 % (46-50). Plasma glucosylceramide in eliglustat treated patients (n = 4) reached values below the normal range (n = 20 healthy controls). Biochemical markers decreased or stabilized in switchers from ERT to eliglustat (n = 2), but less in miglustat switchers (n = 7). Clinical parameters responded comparably upon eliglustat and ERT treatment. Conclusions: Our explorative study provides evidence that biochemical markers respond comparably in patients receiving eliglustat treatment and ERT, while the corresponding response to miglustat treatment is less.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据