4.6 Article

Combined Experimental and Simulation Studies Suggest a Revised Mode of Action of the Anti-Alzheimer Disease Drug NQ-Trp

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 36, 页码 12657-12666

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500888

关键词

aggregation; inhibitors; molecular dynamics; peptides; reaction mechanisms

资金

  1. CONACyT (Mexico)
  2. ANR SIMI7 GRAL [12-BS07-0011]
  3. European Social Fund, Talents FCG Program
  4. ANR LABEX [ANR-11-LABX-0011]
  5. Foundation Pierre Gilles de Gennes
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-LABX-0011] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of the aggregation of the monomeric peptide -amyloid (A) into oligomers is a widely studied therapeutic approach in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Many small molecules have been reported to work in this way, including 1,4-naphthoquinon-2-yl-L-tryptophan (NQ-Trp). NQ-Trp has been reported to inhibit aggregation, to rescue cells from A toxicity, and showed complete phenotypic recovery in an in vivo AD model. In this work we investigated its molecular mechanism by using a combined approach of experimental and theoretical studies, and obtained converging results. NQ-Trp is a relatively weak inhibitor and the fluorescence data obtained by employing the fluorophore widely used to monitor aggregation into fibrils can be misinterpreted due to the inner filter effect. Simulations and NMR experiments showed that NQ-Trp has no specific binding site-type interaction with mono- and dimeric A, which could explain its low inhibitory efficiency. This suggests that the reported anti-AD activity of NQ-Trp-type molecules in in vivo models has to involve another mechanism. This study has revealed the potential pitfalls in the development of aggregation inhibitors for amyloidogenic peptides, which are of general interest for all the molecules studied in the context of inhibiting the formation of toxic aggregates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据