4.6 Article

Eliminating Voltage Decay of Lithium-Rich Li1.14Mn0.54Ni0.14Co0.14O2 Cathodes by Controlling the Electrochemical Process

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 20, 页码 7503-7510

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201406641

关键词

cathode materials; charge-discharge processes; ion migration; lithium-ion batteries; voltage decay

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21403263]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551783]
  3. Zhejiang Province Preferential Postdoctoral Scientific Research Project [BSH1402076]
  4. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2014A610040]
  5. DOE-EERE under the Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lithium-rich cathode material Li1.14Mn0.54Ni0.14Co0.14O2 (LNMCO) is prepared by a co-precipitation method. The issue of voltage decay in long-term cycling is largely eliminated by control of the charge-discharge voltage range. The LNMCO material exhibits 9.8% decay in discharge voltage over 200 cycles between 2.0-4.6 V, during which the working voltage decays significantly, from 3.57 V to 3.22 V. The decay was decelerated by a factor of six by using a voltage window of 2.0-4.4 V, from 3.53 V to 3.47 V. IR and Raman spectra reveal that the transformation of layered structure to spinel is significantly retarded under 2.0-4.4V cycling conditions. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was also applied for examining phase change in an individual particle during cycling, showing that the spinel phase occurs both at 2.0-4.6 V and at 2.0-4.4 V, but is not dominant in the latter. Normalization of Li can remove the additional impact on the voltage decay which is brought by different amounts of Li intercalation. The mechanism of no voltage decay at 2.0-4.4 V cycling is raised and electrochemical impedance spectrum data also support the hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据