4.6 Article

Air-processed high performance ternary blend solar cell based on PTB7-Th: PCDTBT:PC70BM

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 222-227

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.06.040

关键词

Ternary organic solar cells; Low bandgap polymer; Wide bandgap polymer; Cascade energy levels; Morphology; Stability

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61377031]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61404073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ternary bulk heterojunctions (BHJs) are promising candidates that can improve the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of organic solar cells (OSCs). In this paper, a ternary OSC with two donors, including one wide bandgap polymer poly[N-90-heptadecanyl- 2,7-carbazole-alt-5,5-(4',7'-di-2-thienyl-2',1',3'-benzothiadiazole)] (PCDTBT), one low bandgap polymer Poly[4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl) thiophen-2-yl) benzo[1,2-b: 4,5-b'] dithiophene-co-3-fluorothieno[3,4-b] thiophene-2-carboxylate] (PTB7-Th), and one acceptor [6,6]-phenyl C70 butyric acid methyl ester (PC70BM), is fabricated in atmospheric conditions. By incorporating a 20% content of PCDTBT, an optimized PCE of 7.86% for ternary OSC is characterized by a short-circuit current density (J(sc)) of 15.21 mA cm(-2), a fill factor of 69.70% and an open-circuit voltage (V-oc) of 0.74 V. The V-oc values increased steadily from 0.73 to 0.86 V as the increase of PCDTBT fraction, which indicates that the V-oc of ternary OSC is not limited by the smallest one of the corresponding binary OSC. We show that the J(sc) of the ternary OSC is better than those of the binary OSC in virtue of the complementary polymer absorption and cascade energy levels, as well as optimized morphology of the ternary system. Furthermore, the lifetime of the devices with PCDTBT is greatly enhanced. This work indicates that two donors (PTB7-Th/PCDTBT) ternary BHJs system provide a simple and effective method to improve the performance and also the stability of OSCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据