4.6 Article

Associations of sleep bruxism with age, sleep apnea, and daytime problematic behaviors in children

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 557-565

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12492

关键词

tooth grinding; sleep-disordered breathing; development; co-sleeping; community samples

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [21659256]
  2. Osaka University
  3. Challenge to Intractable Oral Diseases
  4. JSPS [25253102]
  5. Center of Innovation Science and Technology based Radical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program (COI STREAM), JST
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21659256, 16H03273, 25253102] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of sleep bruxism in children in Japan, and its relationships with sleep-related factors and daytime problematic behavior. Subjects and MethodsGuardians of 6023 children aged 2-12years completed the Japanese Sleep Questionnaire. Multiple regression analysis and structural equationmodeling were performed. ResultsSleep bruxism was reported in 21.0% children (n=1263): the prevalence was highest in the age group of 5-7years (27.4%). Multiple regression analysis showed that sleep bruxism had significant correlations with age 5-7years (OR: 1.72; P<0.0001), Moves a lot during sleep' (OR: 1.47; P<0.0001), sleeps with mouth open' (OR: 1.56; P<0.0001), and snores loudly' (OR: 1.80; P<0.0001). In structural equationmodeling, sleep bruxism had a significant but weak direct effect on daytime problematic behavior, while sleep bruxism significantly correlated with obstructive sleep apnea, which had a higher direct effect on daytime problematic behavior. ConclusionsSleep bruxism was reported in 21.0% of Japanese children and had independent relationships with age, movements during sleep, and snoring. A comorbidity of sleep-disordered breathing might be related to daytime problematic behavior in children with sleep bruxism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据