4.7 Article

Digital image correlation with gray gradient constraints: Application to spatially variant speckle images

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 85-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.07.012

关键词

Digital image correlation; Subset size; Window function; Speckle pattern; Deformation measurement

类别

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB933702, 2011CB809106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11002003, 11472013, 41201401, 51078228]
  3. Preferred Foundation of Director of Institute of Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [Y3SJ7500CX]
  4. Research Innovation Projects of Shanghai Postgraduate [20131129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a carrier of local deformation information, speckle pattern inside a subset is usually crucial for surface displacement acquisition based upon a digital image correlation (DIC) method, since both accuracy and precision of DIC method are closely related to the amount of speckle information in a subset. Although some comprehensive theoretical frameworks have been developed to estimate the quality of local speckle patterns, it is still a great challenge how to effectively integrate the subset speckle information into the well-developed correlation criteria used for DIC. By means of a well-designed square window function, we here propose the concept of continuous subset in order to modulate subset size in a continuously derivable manner. Afterwards, we further develop a new constrained zero-normalized sum-of-squared differences (CZNSSD) criterion and construct the corresponding iterative algorithm, based on which the subset size involved can be automatically determined according to the necessary amount of speckle information. Numerical results of synthetic speckle images indicate that the set of algorithm can enhance the accuracy and precision of displacement measurement, especially for spatially variant speckle images. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据