4.8 Article

Halogenation of a Nonplanar Molecular Semiconductor to Tune Energy Levels and Bandgaps for Electron Transport

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1892-1900

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00329

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF MRSEC program through the Princeton Center for Complex Materials [DMR-0819860, DMR-1420531]
  2. SOLAR Initiative at the NSF [DMR-1035217]
  3. NSF Nanoelectronics Beyond (NEB) program [CHE-1124754]
  4. NRI [2011-NE-2205GB]
  5. NSF [DMR-1005892, DMR-103527]
  6. NIH/NIGMS [DMR-0936384]
  7. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-0520415]
  8. NDSEG Fellowship (Air Force Office of Scientific Research) [32 CFR 168a]
  9. German Academic Exchange Service
  10. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  11. Division Of Chemistry
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1124754] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Though peripheral halogen substitution is a known strategy to lower the lowest unoccupied (LUMO) and highest occupied (HOMO) molecular orbital energy levels of planar molecular semiconductors, this strategy has not been explored in conformationally contorted systems. We demonstrate that substitution of peripheral hydrogens with fluorine and chlorine can effectively lower the energy levels of contorted hexabenzocoronene (cHBC) despite its nonplanar conformation. The HOMO energy level lowers comparably with fluorine and chlorine substitution. Due to chlorines ability to accommodate more electron density than fluorine, chlorination lowers the LUMO energy level more effectively compared to fluorination (31-60 meV/F versus 53-83 meV/Cl), resulting in a narrowing of the optical bandgap. We find the preference for electron transport to increase with increasing halogenation of cHBC. As an example, thin-film transistors fabricated with 8F-8Cl-cHBC demonstrated electron mobilities as high as 10(-2) cm(2)/(V s) and solar cells with 8F-8Cl-cHBC and poly(3-hexylthiophene), P3HT, showed power-conversion efficiencies as high as 1.2%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据