4.5 Article

B7-H3, B7-H4, Foxp3 and IL-2 expression in cervical cancer: Associations with patient outcome and clinical significance

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 2183-2190

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4607

关键词

B7-H3; B7-H4; Foxp3; cervical cancer; co-stimulatory molecule; immunohistochemistry

类别

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81372776]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province [2011225009]
  3. Higher Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program [20122104110014]
  4. Free Researcher Project of Shengjing Hospital [201302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to determine the expression of B7-H3, B7-H4, Foxp3 and IL-2 in cervical cancer tissues, and evaluate the corresponding clinical significance. The expression of B7-H3, B7-H4, Foxp3 and IL-2 in 108 cervical cancer specimens was detected using immunohistochemistry, and their relationship with clinicopathologic parameters was determined. B7-H3, B7-H4 and Foxp3 had high levels of expression in cervical cancer cells (72.22, 80.56, and 91.56%, respectively). B7-H3 levels were only significantly associated with tumor size (P=0.013), while B7-H4, Foxp3 and IL-2 levels were significantly associated with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P=0.023, 0.014 and 0.036, respectively) and tumor size (P=0.045, 0.010 and 0.021, respectively). Their expression levels were not correlated with age, histologic type, differentiation and lymph node metastasis (all P>0.05). Cox regression multivariate analysis confirmed that B7-H3 or B7-H4 overexpression was an independent prognostic factor. In addition, there were significant positive relationships between the expression of B7-H3 and B7-H4 with Foxp3 (P<0.001). In contrast, the expression of B7-H3 and B7-H4 was negatively correlated with IL-2 (P<0.05). B7-H3, B7-H4 and Foxp3 may be useful biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer for predicting treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据