4.5 Article

Bacterial ghosts as adjuvants in syngeneic tumour cell lysate-based anticancer vaccination in a murine lung carcinoma model

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 171-178

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.5252

关键词

bacterial ghosts; Bacillus subtilis; anticancer vaccination; adjuvant; mice; Lewis lung carcinoma; metastasis

类别

资金

  1. Lithuanian Research Council project 'Immunomodulating properties of bacteriophage derived dsRNA of different size and their use as vaccine adjuvants' [TAP-LLT-15-028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instead of relying on external anticancer factors for treatment, immunotherapy utilizes the host's own immune system and directs it against given tumour antigens. This study demonstrated that it is possible to overcome the documented immunosuppressive properties of tumour cell lysate by supplementing it with appropriate adjuvant. Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)-challenged C57BL/6 mice were treated with LLC cryo-lysate mixed with either bacterial ghosts (BGs) generated from E. coli Nissle 1917 or B. subtilis 70 kDa protein as adjuvants. Median and overall survival, the size of metastatic foci in lung tissue and levels of circulating CD8a(+) T cells were evaluated and compared to the untreated control mice or mice treated with LLC lysate alone. After primary tumour removal, a course of three subcutaneous vaccinations with LLC lysate supplemented with BGs led to a significant increase in overall survival (80% after 84 days of follow-up vs. 40% in untreated control mice), a significant increase in circulating CD8a(+) T cells (16.57 vs. 12.6% in untreated control mice) and a significant decrease in metastasis foci area and incidence. LLC lysate supplemented with B. subtilis protein also improved the inspected parameters in the treated mice, when compared against the untreated control mice, but not to a significant degree. Therefore, whole cell lysate supplemented with BGs emerges as an immunostimulatory construct with potential clinical applications in cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据