4.5 Article

Distinct expression profile of lncRNA in endometrial carcinoma

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 3405-3412

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.5173

关键词

endometrial carcinoma; microarray; lncRNA; GO; KEGG; co-expression network

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302304, 81572556]
  2. Key Program of Science and Technology Development Fund of Nanjing Medical University [2013NJMU145, 2014NJMU103, 2014NJMU098, 2015NJMUZD063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common malignancy in women. Dispite its prevalence, the prognosis of endometrial carcinoma still relies on conventional histological type, grade and invasion information. Its morbidity is still increasing and the outcome is very poor. To the best of our knowledge, hormonal imbalance and/or molecular genetic alterations are the main cause of EC. However, the alterations of lncRNAs which accounts for approximately 4/5 of human transcripts are still poorly understood. In the present study, using the RiboArray (TM) Custom Array, we studied the expression profiles of lncRNA in EC as compared to normal endometrium (NE) to find potential core lncRNAs for the diagnosis of EC. We found the potential core lncRNA by GO, KEGG, lncRNA and mRNA co-expression network. The potential functional lncRNAs were further detected by qPCR to validate the microarray results. A total of 172 lncRNAs and 188 mRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between type I EC and the NE samples (fold change >1.5). qPCR validation showed good consistency with the microarray data. GO, pathway analysis, the lncRNA and mRNA co-expression network as well as the TCGA data revealed that 6 lncRNAs (KIAA0087, RP11-501O2, FAM212B-AS1, LOC102723552, RP11-140I24 and RP11-600K151) may be the core regulators of endometrial carcinogenesis. The potential core lncRNAs revealed by the mRNA and lncRNA co-expression network might be helpful to explore potential early diagnostic and therapeutic targets for EC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据