4.8 Article

FBXO10 deficiency and BTK activation upregulate BCL2 expression in mantle cell lymphoma

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 35, 期 48, 页码 6223-6234

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.155

关键词

-

资金

  1. UW-Madison Start-up funds
  2. KL2 Scholar Award [UL1TR0000427, KL2TR000428]
  3. NIH [R01 CA187299]
  4. MACC fund
  5. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [K08 CA174750]
  6. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [Hatch 1002874]
  7. UW Forward Lymphoma Fund
  8. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC)
  9. NIH/NCI UW Comprehensive Cancer Center Support [P30 CA014520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) by ibrutinib is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, both primary and acquired resistance to ibrutinib have developed in a significant number of these patients. A combinatory strategy targeting multiple oncogenic pathways is critical to enhance the efficacy of ibrutinib. Here, we focus on the BCL2 anti-apoptotic pathway. In a tissue microarray of 62 MCL samples, BCL2 expression positively correlated with BTK expression. Increased levels of BCL2 were shown to be due to a defect in protein degradation because of no or little expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase FBXO10, as well as transcriptional upregulation through BTK-mediated canonical nuclear factor-kappa B activation. RNA-seq analysis confirmed that a set of anti-apoptotic genes (for example, BCL2, BCL-XL and DAD1) was downregulated by BTK short hairpin RNA. The downregulated genes also included those that are critical for B-cell growth and proliferation, such as BCL6, MYC, PIK3CA and BAFF-R. Targeting BCL2 by the specific inhibitor ABT-199 synergized with ibrutinib in inhibiting growth of both ibrutinib-sensitive and -resistant cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest co-targeting of BTK and BCL2 as a new therapeutic strategy in MCL, especially for patients with primary resistance to ibrutinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据