4.8 Article

PERK inhibits DNA replication during the Unfolded Protein Response via Claspin and Chk1

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 678-686

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.239

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [SAF2013-49149-R, BFU2014-51672-REDC]
  2. Fundacion CajaCanarias [AP2015/008]
  3. IMBRAIN Project - EU FP7 [FP7-REGPOT-2012-CT2012-31637-IMBRAIN]
  4. Gobierno de Canarias
  5. World Wide Cancer Research (WWCR) [12-0149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stresses such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation and acidification disturb protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and activate the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) to trigger adaptive responses through the effectors, PERK, IRE1 and ATF6. Most of these responses relate to ER homoeostasis; however, here we show that the PERK branch of the UPR also controls DNA replication. Treatment of cells with the non-genotoxic UPR agonist thapsigargin led to a rapid inhibition of DNA synthesis that was attributable to a combination of DNA replication fork slowing and reduced replication origin firing. DNA synthesis inhibition was dependent on the UPR effector PERK and was associated with phosphorylation of the checkpoint adaptor protein Claspin and activation of the Chk1 effector kinase, both of which occurred in the absence of detectable DNA damage. Remarkably, thapsigargin did not inhibit bulk DNA synthesis or activate Chk1 in cells depleted of Claspin, or when Chk1 was depleted or subject to chemical inhibition. In each case thapsigargin-resistant DNA synthesis was due to an increase in replication origin firing that compensated for reduced fork progression. Taken together, our results unveil a new aspect of PERK function and previously unknown roles for Claspin and Chk1 as negative regulators of DNA replication in the absence of genotoxic stress. Because tumour cells proliferate in suboptimal environments, and frequently show evidence of UPR activation, this pathway could modulate the response to DNA replication-targeted chemotherapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据