4.8 Article

Olfactomedin 4 deletion induces colon adenocarcinoma in ApcMin/+ mice

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 35, 期 40, 页码 5237-5247

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.58

关键词

-

资金

  1. intramural research fund of the National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colon carcinogenesis is a multiple-step process involving the accumulation of a series of genetic and epigenetic alterations. The most commonly initiating event of intestinal carcinogenesis is mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, which leads to activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4) has emerged as an intestinal stem-cell marker, but its biological function in the intestine remains to be determined. Here we show that Olfm4 deletion induced colon adenocarcinoma in the distal colon of Apc(Min/+) mice. Mechanistically, we found that OLFM4 is a target gene of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway and can downregulate beta-catenin signaling by competing with Wnt ligands for binding to Frizzled receptors, as well as by inhibition of the Akt-GSK-3 beta (Akt-glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta) pathway. We have shown that both Wnt and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) signaling were boosted in tumor tissues of Apc Olfm4 double-mutant mice. These data establish OLFM4 as a critical negative regulator of the Wnt/beta-catenin and NF-kappa B pathways that inhibits colon-cancer development initiated by APC mutation. In addition, Olfm4 deletion significantly enhanced intestinal-crypt proliferation and inflammation induced by azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate. Thus, OLFM4 has an important role in the regulation of intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis, and could be a potential therapeutic target for intestinal malignant tumors. Unlike the human colonic epithelium, the mouse colonic epithelium does not express OLFM4, but nevertheless, systemic OLFM4 deletion promotes colon tumorigenesis and that loss from mucosal neutrophils may have a role to play.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据