4.7 Article

Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.005

关键词

Group decision making; Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; Consistency; Consensus; Hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71301110]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education [3XJC630015]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130181120059]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [skqy201525]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71301110]
  6. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education [3XJC630015]
  7. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130181120059]
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [skqy201525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of hesitant information in pairwise comparisons enriches the flexibility of qualitative decision making and allows for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation (HFLPR). This paper develops separate consistency and consensus processes to deal with HFLPR individual rationality and group rationality. First, a possibility distribution approach and a 2-tuple linguistic model are introduced as support tools. Then, a new consistency measure is defined and a convergent algorithm described to aid the consistency improvement process in a given HFLPR. The algorithm adopts a local revision strategy and can be easily interpreted. Further, a direct consensus reaching process is presented to solve the HFLPR consensus problems. A prominent characteristic of this consensus reaching process is that the feedback system is based directly on the consensus degrees, thereby reducing the proximity measure calculations. Finally, the proposed consistency and consensus processes are applied to an investment project selection problem. The results and an in-depth comparative analysis verify the potential use and effectiveness of the proposed methods. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据