4.7 Article

A multi-perspective dynamic network performance efficiency measurement of an evacuation: A dynamic network-DEA approach

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.019

关键词

Evacuation planning performance; Dynamic network DEA; Evacuation traffic management strategies; Infrastructure systems as processes

资金

  1. National Science Foundation at the Foundation
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1537762] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1536477, 1536808] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we consider evacuation planning as a multi-perspective, multi-system, and multi-process operation, and explore how a dynamic network performance measurement approach helps us to measure the efficiency performance of this system of systems. Two different perspectives are studied, i.e., that of the transportation agency and that of the household. These perspectives are linked through intermediate outputs and carry-overs generated by the underlying processes associated with each perspective. Within this context, we propose a theoretical representation of a slacks-based dynamic network DEA approach for measuring evacuation performance when a ramp closure evacuation traffic management strategy is considered. This representation requires a theoretical yet tractable conceptual framework that incorporates stakeholder perspectives, evacuation-related systems, processes and their interdependencies. This research combines the dynamic network DEA approach with traffic engineering and socio-behavioral theory of protective action. An initial exploration of the proposed approach allows for the discovery of efficiency interdependencies among perspectives, which in turn provides useful information and insights for the future design of holistic evacuation traffic management strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据