4.8 Article

Narrowly Distributed Crystal Orientation in Biomineral Vaterite

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 19, 页码 6516-6523

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01542

关键词

-

资金

  1. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation [BSF-2010065]
  2. NSF [DMR-1105167]
  3. DOE [DE-FG02-07ER15899, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University
  5. European Research Council under European Union's Seventh Framework Program [336077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biominerals formed by animals provide skeletal support and many other functions. They were previously shown to grow by aggregation of amorphous nanoparticles but never to grow ion-by-ion from solution, which is a common growth mechanism for abiotic crystals. We analyze vaterite (CaCO3) multicrystalline spicules from the solitary tunicate Herdmania momus, with polarization-dependent imaging contrast (PIC)-mapping and scanning and aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopies. The first fully quantitative PIC-mapping data, presented here, measured 0-30 degrees angle spreads between immediately adjacent crystals. Such narrowly distributed crystal orientations demonstrate that crystallinity does not propagate from one crystal to another (0 degrees angle spreads), nor that new crystals with random orientation (90 degrees) nucleate. There are no organic layers at the interface between crystals; hence, a new, unknown growth mechanism must be invoked, with crystal nucleation constrained within 30 degrees. Two observations are consistent with crystal growth from solution: vaterite microcrystals express crystal faces and are smooth at the nanoscale after cryo-fracture. The observation of 30 degrees angle spreads, lack of interfacial organic layers, and smooth fracture figures broadens the range of known biomineralization mechanisms and may inspire novel synthetic crystal growth strategies. Spherulitic growth from solution is one possible mechanism consistent with all these observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据