4.7 Article

Investigation on the dynamics of air-gun array bubbles based on the dual fast multipole boundary element method

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 157-167

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.052

关键词

Air-gun; Bubble dynamics; BEM; FMM; dual BIE

资金

  1. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51379039]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [JC201307]
  4. FAPERJ - the State of Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation, Brazil [E-16/201.979/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The air-gun array has important applications in ocean engineering. In this work, new dynamic behaviors of the air-gun array bubbles were investigated. The new adaptive fast multipole boundary element method (FMBEM) was implemented to accelerate the calculation of large scale moving boundary problems. The dual boundary integral equation (BIE) with an optimal linear combination of the regular BIE and the gradient BIE was used to facilitate a faster convergent FMBEM. It has been verified that the accuracy of the present numerical model was satisfactory for the dynamic simulation and the overall computational cost was scaled to O(N-1.1) with N being the number of unknowns, which surpassed the conventional BEM largely. The behavior of air-gun array bubbles was studied for different distribution forms of the air-guns with the gravity effect considered. By increasing the dimensions of the bubble array, it can be seen that the shield effect' of outer bubbles on inner bubbles was more evident. Pressure gradient was the dominant factor that determined the re-entrant jet's direction. The period of bubble array was longer if array scale increased. The distance between bubbles versus the intensity of interaction effect has been studied. In addition, the evolutions and the movements of the bubbles are quite different in this kind of large scale problem. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据