4.8 Article

Ionic Liquid-Derived Nitrogen-Enriched Carbon/Sulfur Composite Cathodes with Hierarchical Microstructure-A Step Toward Durable High-Energy and High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1674-1683

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm504460p

关键词

-

资金

  1. BASF International Network for Batteries and Electrochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the preparation of turbostratic carbon in monolithic form by silica template method and its use as host matrix to trap polysulfides in LiS batteries. The synthesized ionic liquid-derived carbon is hierarchically structured with pore size maxima around 6 nm and 750 nm, and it has a room temperature electrical conductivity of 78 S cm(1), owing to a high content of pyridinic and graphitic nitrogen. Further, this carbon can accommodate up to similar to 80% sulfur by weight, and the resulting nanocomposite demonstrates promising performance as novel electrode material for LiS batteries. Cathodes with low areal mass loading (1 mg(sulfur) cm(2)) can be cycled at C/5 and 1C over several hundreds of cycles with low polarization and very little capacity fading (4% between the fifth and 1000th cycles at 1C). Highly loaded cathodes (4 mg(sulfur) cm(2)) also exhibit good cyclability at C/5 with areal capacities of 2.6 mAh cm(2) on average over 200 cycles. Yet the high capacities make the cells more prone to electrolyte decomposition, which eventually gives rise to low round trip energy efficiencies depending on the electrolyte-to-sulfur mass ratio. Results from in operando X-ray diffraction show that nanocrystalline Li2S forms midway through the second discharge plateau, and sulfur recrystallizes in the metastable beta-S-8 phase, with 30 to 40 nm crystallites, but undergoes amorphization under open circuit conditions. Overall, this work represents a step forward in the development of durable high-energy LiS batteries and provides valuable insights into the operation of such cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据