4.7 Article

Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on preference-based quality of life in type 2 diabetes: Results from the Look AHEAD trial

期刊

OBESITY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 856-864

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21445

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Health and Human Services through National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK57136, DK57149, DK56990, DK57177, DK57171, DK57151, DK57182, DK57131, DK57002, DK57078, DK57154, DK57178, DK57219, DK57008, DK57135, DK56992]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  4. National Institute of Nursing Research
  5. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  6. Office of Research on Women's Health
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs
  9. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  10. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Bayview General Clinical Research Center [M01RR02719]
  11. Massachusetts General Hospital Mallinckrodt General Clinical Research Center
  12. Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Clinical Research Center [M01RR01066]
  13. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center General Clinical Research Center [M01RR00051]
  14. Clinical Nutrition Research Unit [P30 DK48520]
  15. University of Tennessee at Memphis General Clinical Research Center [M01RR0021140]
  16. University of Pittsburgh General Clinical Research Center [M01RR000056]
  17. Clinical Translational Research Center - Clinical & Translational Science Award [UL1 RR 024153]
  18. NIH [DK 046204]
  19. Frederic C. Bartter General Clinical Research Center [M01RR01346]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared with standard diabetes support and education (DSE) on preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in persons with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes. MethodsLook AHEAD was a multisite, randomized trial of 5,145 participants assigned to ILI or DSE. Four instruments were administered during the trial: Feeling Thermometer (FT), Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), and Short Form 6D (SF-6D). Linear mixed effect models were used to estimate the mean difference in preference scores by treatment group for 9 years. ResultsThe ILI had higher mean FT (0.019, 95% CI, 0.015-0.024, P<0.001) and SF-6D (0.011, 95% CI, 0.006-0.014, P<0.001) scores than the DSE. No significant group differences were observed for the HUI2 (0.004, 95% CI, -0.003 to 0.010, P=0.23) and HUI3 (0.004, -0.004 to 0.012, P=0.36). In year 1, the ILI had higher mean preference scores for all instruments. Thereafter, the increases remained significant only for FT and SF-6D, and the effects also become smaller. ConclusionsILI aimed at reducing body weight among persons with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes improves preference-based HRQOL in the short term, but its long-term effect is unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据