4.7 Article

Adipose Tissue Fibrosis, Hypertrophy, and Hyperplasia: Correlations with Diabetes in Human Obesity

期刊

OBESITY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 597-605

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21377

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01DK097449, DK090262, T32DK101357]
  2. Michigan Metabolomics-Obesity Center/Michigan Nutrition-Obesity Research Center Pilot Grant
  3. Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research T1 Bench to Bedside Translation Pilot Grant [2UL1TR000433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The relationship between adipose tissue fibrosis, adipocyte hypertrophy, and preadipocyte hyperplasia in the context of obesity and the correlation of these tissue-based phenomena with systemic metabolic disease are poorly defined. The goal of this study was to clarify the relationship between adipose tissue fibrosis, adipocyte hypertrophy, and preadipocyte hyperplasia in human obesity and determine the correlation of these adipose-tissue based phenomena with diabetes. Methods: Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues from humans with obesity collected during bariatric surgery were studied with QRTPCR, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry for expression of collagens and fibrosis-related proteins, adipocyte size, and preadipocyte frequency. Results were correlated with clinical characteristics including diabetes status. Results: Fibrosis was decreased, hypertrophy was increased, and preadipocyte frequency and fibrotic gene expression were decreased in adipose tissues from diabetic subjects compared to non-diabetic subjects. These differences were greater in visceral compared to subcutaneous adipose tissue. Conclusions: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that adipose tissue fibrosis in the context of human obesity limits adipocyte hyper-trophy and is associated with a reciprocal increase in adipocyte hyperplasia, with beneficial effects on systemic metabolism. These findings suggest adipose tissue fibrosis as a potential target for manipulation of adipocyte metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据